WHITEWASH. My Submission to the Covid inquiry was not published - here is the government's pathetic excuse why...
My submission to the Australian Federal Covid Inquiry was not published.
I sent in my submission to the Federal Covid Inquiry on 15 December 2023 - my submission is recorded but it was not published1. I have shared the submission itself below.
Below the submission itself, I will give the response, from the government, as to why it was not published. Basically, because I included the footnotes in the main body of the text, it was called an “attachment” — I think it is pretty obvious that they want to bury all the evidence, by discrediting any supportable claims by not publishing the footnotes containing the links. I rightly called it bullsh*t, and it is. It is a complete whitewash.
PLEASE SHARE THIS ARTICLE, SEND IT TO EVERYONE. KNOWLEDGE OF THEIR BULLSH*T NEEDS TO BE SPREAD FAR AND WIDE.
Here is my submission: it was fairly brief and to the point, and I think it is pretty easy to see why the committee did not wish to publish it; it contains a very clear rebuke to their whitewashing of the facts.
My submission
1) Coercing Australian citizens to take an experimental medication was a clear infringement of the Nuremberg Code2:
“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This
means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give
consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of
choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit,
duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion;
and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements
of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding
and enlightened decision.”
2) That the mRNA Covid vaccines were experimental3 is becoming more and more abundantly clear. The mRNA transcription process skips over the Methyl-1-Psuedouridine and creates random proteins4, a process that could create harmful prions, the agents of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. There were fragments of DNA in the RNA in the injection and these fragments included SV-40, a cancer-causing agent5
3) The Covid Vaccines were only approved by the FDA under Emergency Use Approval (EUA) - the TGA page saying approval was not rushed (which has since disappeared from the internet) contained a clear lie, because Provisional Approval is essentially the same as EUA6.
4) Note that even if someone took the AstraZeneca vaccine (which was later removed for safety issues) they would still have had to take an mRNA booster.
5) Prime Minister Scott Morrison and the Federal Government clearly approved of and enabled the policy of coercing Australians to take the Covid vaccinations by threatening them with loss of jobs (“no jab no pay” and “as mandatory as possible” ) a policy which was recommended by the AHPPC7 and Scott Morrison and put into force by State Governments8 - in October 2021 the Cabinet discussed employment mandates but did not follow through.
6) Nonetheless it is arguable that the Federal Government had a duty to stop the states from infringing the Australian Constitution: medical conscription is clearly not allowed. The Constitution disallows ‘medical conscription’ in Section 51 (xxiiiA); in the High Court in 1949 it was decided this means no medical coercion is allowed by direct or indirect means.
7) By warning Doctors in March 2021 they would be deregistered if they questioned Covid vaccines9 the Federally legislated body AHPRA infringed on patient rights to informed consent with regard to Covid vaccination. This was a serious breach of the Nuremberg Code as well, especially considering the large number of disabilities and deaths that resulted10 and the likelihood that Australian excess deaths in 2022 and 2023 were related to Covid vaccination11.
8) The TGA approval process for the Covid vaccine was, quite frankly, abysmally inadequate. The only document examined by the TGA for approval of the Pfizer vaccines was a sloppy document that still had track changes enabled, and that demonstrated that the Lipid Nanoparticles of the Pfizer vaccines did not stay at the injection site in rats, but spread throughout the body, particularly to the ovaries. The track changes revealed their indecision concerning the safety of the vaccine with regard to pregnancy, and seems to indicate they were recommending it as safe, without evidence12.
9) In the past it has taken more than one inquiry / Royal Commission to get to the facts13. I hope those conducting this inquiry will honestly look at the evidence that wrong was done, for the sake of their own future reputations, and, indeed, for the sake of their own immortal souls (Mark 8:36).
Andrew P Partington is the author of “Transgenic” https://www.amazon.com.au/TRANSGENIC-Humanised-synthetic-SARS-CoV2-vaccines/dp/B0CK44F1MF
My email to the inquiry on 2 April 2024
My name is Andrew P Partington.
My submission to the Covid inquiry is not visible. Why?
Their bullsh*t reply on 18th April
OFFICIAL
Good afternoon Andrew,
All submissions have been received and considered in their non-redacted form as part of the inquiry process.
In accordance with our Privacy notice that can be found on our Submissions Page, submissions may have been redacted where they contain material with the personal or business information of third parties, if the department does not have their consent to publish the information.
As per the disclaimer notice that can be found on the List of Submissions page, we have published submissions but have not published evidence or attachments that were provided.
As your submission was identified as an article attachment, it has been reviewed as part of the inquiry but considered to be evidence rather than a submission for the purposes of publication.
Redactions may have also been made where a reference in a submission may potentially breach copyright.
Kind regards,
Aaron
My reply to their bullsh*t reply
Good afternoon Aaron
The fact is, the only person my submission mentioned was the Prime Minister of Australia at the time, Scott Morrison.
Your reply will be going on social media, and will be read by my many followers, which will almost certainly give it much wider publicity than if it had been published.
How terribly ironic.
Andrew P Partington.
And by the way it was certainly not an “attachment.” What a load of bullsh*t.
If you look up the page yourself, there are two submissions in my name, by the way, the first had a small mistake in it
Mulroney, T.E., Pöyry, T., Yam-Puc, J.C. et al. N1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes ribosomal frameshifting. Nature (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06800-3
Legislation is not available from WA parliament website but can be downloaded here: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/api/v1/file/fff6eb56-635e-4e85-86a0-45ed0aeac4a1.pdf
The TGA says “only 13 deaths were linked to vaccination. Let me point out that Italy in 2014 cancelled the Novartis influenza vaccine over only 13 deaths. And what is rather amazing about this figure of 13 deaths is that the TGA’s own DAEN database of vaccine reactions records 939 deaths. Considering that the TGA may have a slight conflict of interest, in that they might have every reason to want to claim that the vaccine they coerced everyone into taking is safe, one wonders if they are the best people to be assessing whether the 939 deaths that were submitted by health professionals and patients really were related to the vaccine, or not. Underreporting in the DAEN database is a distinct probability as well: the recent release of the data from the CDC’s v-safe app reveals that the true underreporting factor for VAERS in the US is around 140. VAERS themselves in a study admitted to an underreporting factor of 6.5, in which they specifically requested that the people in the study make a VAERS report.” (First Fact Check) In fact there are more than 939 deaths recorded in DAEN now.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366445769_Probable_causal_association_between_Australia%27s_new_regime_of_high_all-cause_mortality_and_its_COVID-19_vaccine_rollout
FOI TGA document 6, the Nonclinical Evaluation Report BNT162b2 [mRNA] COVID-19 vaccine (COMIRNATY™) Submission No: PM-2020-05461-1-2 Sponsor: Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd January 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20230204175226/https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf
http://www.minutesofevidence.com.au/the-coranderrk-story/ There were actually several Coranderrk inquiries, but the last one got at the full story.
Attachment? Every submission by definition is an attachment.
I was amazed that mine was published. Interestingly, I didn't mention a word about the vaccine, all I talked about was the lack of evidence of a novel illness and pandemic. So if you say, "Phantom illness / pandemic," that's OK but you can't say, as you said, "Mandated, experimental jab," which is what they admitted to anyway. Very interesting.
https://www.pmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/submissions/PMC-CGCRI-2023-1734.pdf