ATAGI disappears incriminating Coronavirus advice page.

(A short note: it was a comment by ExcessDeathsAU on my substack that alerted me to this ATAGI page.)

ATAGI is the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation and advises the Australian Federal Minister for Health and Aged Care.

Once upon a time ATAGI had a page advising everyone on what ‘up to date’ vaccination status is. It looked like this:

It contained a list of age groups and demographic categories, with a list of how many doses people should have to be considered fully vaccinated:

This ATAGI page was still largely the same as of December the 3rd 2022, which was the last time someone archived it on the Wayback Machine on archive.org:

https://web.archive.org/web/20221114171101/https://www.health.gov.au/news/atagi-statement-on-defining-up-to-date-status-for-covid-19-vaccination

ATAGI’s advice, still available December 3rd, on whether immunocompromised individuals and people who had natural immunity because they had already had Covid-19 should take the vaccine, and whether males 16-44 should take it, and whether children and adolescents should take it, was perhaps lacking in nuance in retrospect:

Particularly when you consider this review paper published in the Journal of Clinical & Experimental Immunology on September 12 2022:

Citation: Conny Turni and Astrid Lefringhausen (2022) COVID-19 vaccines – An Australian Review. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Immunology. 7(3):491-508. https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/covid19-vaccinesan-australian-review.pdf

They say that natural immunity induced by COVID infection is robust and long lasting.

They list many side effects and point out that there are at least 775 deaths from this vaccine in Australia. Their conclusion is damning:

Conny Turni and Astrid Lefringhausen cite 94 references in their article.

I wonder if ATAGI are actually beginning to read the peer reviewed literature now? (For while the review itself might not be peer reviewed the references are)

This is what happens when you try to get to the ATAGI page now:

No, I still can’t find what I’m looking for. Apologies, resignations, and accountability.

NOTES

Steve Kirsch’s article alerted me to the Conny Turni and Astrid Lefringhausen study

Now published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature: "The mRNA vaccines are neither safe nor effective, but outright dangerous"

Change log

Added the bit in brackets about peer reviewed in response to a comment by Joe bloe