Australian law: there may be a legal pathway to making AHPRA responsible

Patients sue Doctors, Doctors sue AHPRA - accountability.

This is a very important article.

There may be a legal pathway forward in Australia towards making the health bureaucrats and government Ministers who coerced Doctors into giving the experimental vaccines accountable for what they did.

Code of Conduct prevails over AHPRA statement coercing Doctors

Julian Gillespie says that the medical practitioner’s Codes of Conduct prevails over the AHPRA statement in March 2021 coercing practitioners into giving the experimental medication. Practitioners were required to have given accurate information to their patients about the risk benefit analysis, so that patients were fully informed so they could give fully informed consent, and this was their duty, regardless of the AHPRA statement.

This means patients who were injured could sue their doctors, and the doctors found liable can then sue AHPRA for breaching their professional duty, and also those politicians such as Greg Hunt the health minister at the time.

The Doctors will be found liable, and in turn can then sue AHPRA

Julian Gillespie says:

So these practitioners are therefore personally and professionally liable to actions for medical negligence from their patients receiving COVID-19 injectables, particularly those patients who subsequently died or suffered adverse side effects from the COVID-19 injectables.
Additionally, due to the illegal nature of the AHPRA and National Boards joint statement, it does also appear that the public officers of AHPRA and the National Boards responsible for the creation and publication of the 9 March, 2021 statement are now legally exposed to the action of misfeasance in public office. As the harm to COVID-19 vaccine victims was foreseeable, in terms of these still remaining experimental gene-based therapies, these vaccine victims and future victims who later develop vaccine-related injuries and illnesses, can sue the public offices of AHPRA and the National Boards in their personal capacity. A further liability in the same public offices appears available to those registered practitioners who improperly administered the COVID-19 injectables in breach of their Codes of Conduct.
Should those health practitioners subsequently be sued by their patients, and they have to pay damages to their patients, then those health practitioners may in turn be able to sue the public officers of AHPRA and the National Boards for coercing and threatening them to ignore their Codes of Conduct. Such illegal action, again, would be the tort of misfeasance in public office.

There are procedures and protocols for clinical and experimental trials which is part of the medical Code of Conduct,

There is a portion towards the end of the medical Code of Conduct, which is quite startling, but it clearly addresses if you are a medical practitioner and you are involved in a clinical or experimental trial, where effectively the patient is involved in an experimental drug rollout, then there's all these further procedures and protocols, that must be satisfied. Now, again, the Codes of Conduct, it sounds soft to hear them as Codes of Conduct, like it's something that we try and do, no - they are statutory rules, they are legal obligations. Breach them and you're foul of the National Law. So every single time fully informed consent did not occur was another instance that AHPRA should have been in there investigating that health practitioner for not providing all the appropriate information.

Pfizer gave the US CDC and FDA a cumulative adverse event report up to 28 February of 2021 which looked at 44,000 of the first initial vaccine recipients. Of that cohort, 44,000, 3% were dead. This information was not shared with Doctors.

AHPRA’s Code of Conduct clearly states the rules for human participation in medical trials:

• 13.2.6 Ensuring that human participation is voluntary and based on an adequate understanding of sufficient information about the purpose, methods, demands, risks and potential benefits of the research.

• 13.2.11 Respecting the right of research participants to withdraw from any research at any time and without giving reasons.

AHPRA is ‘on the hook’.

Julian Gillespie says AHPRA and the National Medical Boards are ‘on the hook’.

The very basis that they're going in seeking the suspensions of these practitioners who are speaking against the COVID-19 vaccination programmes and the COVID-19 drugs themselves, their fall-back position is the 9 March, 2021 statement. And we show in this legal opinion, that statement was quote, illegal. It was illegal at law for them to even produce it. This is why now AHPRA, the public officers of AHPRA are personally liable to vaccine victims because by that illegal action, they coerced medical practitioners to not provide the proper information for informed consent. And so now AHPRA and the National Boards are on the hook. On the hook, and it's going to be a big damages payout because we've done the sums already.

He further says the intergovernmental agreements and bodies like AHPRA are an unconstitutional intrusion of the Federal level of government into the states.

They are getting together a huge team of compensation / injury lawyers around the country to put together the lawsuit, which promises to be huge, involving many thousands of vaccine injured people around the country.

Here is the video of Julian Gillespie’s speech on Rumble:

Here is the transcript.

This is Jo Nova’s article that alerted me to this story:

https://joannenova.com.au/2022/09/lawyer-argues-doctors-breached-their-sacred-duty-to-patients-with-vaccines/

Article loading slowly: government interference?

PS this article loads very slowly. I will be doing a fact check on Australian government interference soon, via slowing internet speeds for things they don’t want people knowing about.

The solution if this is happening to you is to use a proxy server.

While writing this PS it suddenly started loading quickly again. Funny about that.