Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Another WorldView Is Possible's avatar

That is a 100% accurate Fact-check... I'm going to have to get used to the idea of that, as being - "a thing".

If you're interested - I've already pitched to James Lyons-Weiler, Steve Kirsch and then Igor Chudov - the recent NY Times (and other outlets) story, on a return to masking, based upon the rise in dubious case statistics, and some arbitrary thresholds set by the CDC and local health departments. It appears to me that if they're being reached, it's because of flu season + the Negative Effectiveness (noted above) and damaged immune systems, caused by the Experimental Synthetic mRNA Gene Therapy injections - and not a lack of mandatory mask wearing.

The NYT Article cites three studies, purportedly showing that masks are effective against the infection and spread of airborne illnesses - one of them is relatively new study from the NEJM... I'm not qualified enough in math and statistics, and study design, to adequately evaluate whether it's a bogus claim - but I'm going to suspect that it is - until I hear otherwise.

As Eugyppius and Vijay Prashad pointed out - one of the studies cited - didn't even substantiate the claims of mask effectiveness, being made by the article/CDC Press Release.

I'm still hoping to see the epic takedown and fact-check regarding this constant push towards a medically contraindicated type of intervention - with all sorts of other drawbacks, from the Developmental to the Mass Psychosis Formational.

Expand full comment

No posts