Claim: The Covid vaccines were designed to harm.
At this stage I think that the vaccines were not designed to harm, but it looks like they were not designed NOT to harm.
I have been very dubious of many claims that the Covid vaccines were intentionally designed to harm people. In general, the claims of pre-planning lack specificity and concrete evidence; the comical adage Hanlon’s razor says “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity,” which is itself a humorous rephrasing of Occam’s razor, “The simplest explanation is often the best.”
What really happened?
The sequence of events as I understand it today seems to have looked something like this; and while I have evidence for this whole sequence of events, I am also inferring motivations from the behaviour of the people involved, which may be incorrect, but at this stage to me this sequence of events is simply what seems most likely:
GOF research
Fauci and his cronies were funding gain of function research whose ostensible purpose was to make harmful cross-species viruses, in order that if such a virus did one day cross the species from bat or civet or whatever to human, that we would be pre-prepared and be able to issue a vaccine against it, etc., following the philosophy of Nathan Wolfe, outlined in his book the Viral Storm. (Note that one of the possible secret reasons for creating these viruses was also as offensive biological weapons, although DARPA apparently refused the DEFUSE proposal on the grounds it was too risky, but that’s another rabbit-hole I won’t go down just now.)
Obama Moratorium - research moved to China
But when Obama introduced the moratorium on bioweapons in 2014, Fauci’s cronies (Ralph Baric) moved production and experimentation of the virus to Wuhan, where it escaped the lab possibly as early as September 2019, infecting a few Italians, actually, who were there for the military games. (All of this, with footnotes and evidence, is in my book Transgenic, which you may buy and read.)
Fauci panics - his mate, Jeremy Farrar, gets together a secret team to write a paper debunking the lab leak, for the greater good of science.
After another virologist (Kristian Andersen) noticed the signs that SAR-COV2 came from a lab leak (specifically the furin cleavage site) Fauci panicked. His British friend Jeremy Farrar got together a bunch of virologists to write a paper debunking the lab leak theory; this is all in the public domain because of the emails that were released under FOI to the Intercept last year.
Moderna immediately (in one day, apparently) created an mRNA vaccine for the new virus, as soon as they had the sequence from the Chinese.
CIA, then DOD manages the rollout.
I wonder if part of Fauci’s panic was the fear that this engineered virus was going to kill a lot of people, and he immediately had some sort of secret meeting with the CIA, and we don’t know what was said at this meeting, but I think we can guess. After this the CIA and DOD and the US Federal Government managed the vaccine rollout as well as the propaganda efforts to try to make sure that as many people as possible took the vaccines.
Event 201 beforehand?
The whole effort to create a vaccine, the pandemic propaganda response, all of these government efforts were conveniently rehearsed by health officials around the world at the Gates funded Event 201 in October of 2019.
Sloppy big pharma approvals, they made vaccines that were harmful and didn’t work and the governments didn’t stop them.
Now, my opinion is that the big pharma companies were sloppy, they had become lackadaisical in their pharmaceutical trials, often running three phases concurrently instead of one after the other, and generally rushing through medications and Federal approvals were just rubber-stamping, because everyone on the FDA board was in the pockets of the pharma companies, it would seem, being friends with them all and having accepted a lot of grants in their careers from various organisations and pharma companies and often moving on into lucrative pharma positions after they left the approvals board. This is proven.
Thus the mRNA vaccines, which were gene-editing technology and should have regulated as such, were rushed through and harmed many people because they simply didn’t work, were not safe, and were not effective, in other words, and were neither tested properly nor regulated properly.
Now one of the reasons for this might well be Fauci’s private panic over the whole lab leak scenario, which now looks completely certain.
It was stupid, it was hubris, but was it intentional genocide?
To convince me that this was all pre-planned as an exercise in culling the population, I would have to see a little more evidence.
However there are people making the claim that the vaccines were intentionally harmful and created with the intention to kill. Dr Michael Yeadon is one of them.
Mike Yeadon
To be fair, Dr Mike Yeadon is a person with excellent credentials to make this claim. He is a former vice president of Pfizer, where he spent 16 years as head scientist of the allergy and respiratory research division. He later co-founded a biotech firm, Ziarco, that the Swiss pharmaceutical company Novartis purchased for at least $325 million.
I will quote his article in full, as I wish to respond to it, and it only seems fair to let the reader decide from Dr Michael Yeadon’s own words, what to think about this claim.
By Dr. Michael Yeadon February 8, 2024
You may have seen videos I’ve recorded where I’ve outlined some of the to-me obviously intentional harms built into the alleged vaccines. I’ve been on tiresome, dozens of people commenting email threads. These are the bane of my current existence because they’re not email lists from which you can ask to be removed. No, they’re reply to all fests. And they never stop. I get sometimes dozens of emails daily. I learn to delete them, lest I be tempted to reply, perpetuating the torture. Today, one person questioned whether the harms were really deliberate. After slapping my forehead, I typed this. You may find it useful in case anyone accuses you of perpetuating misinformation or conspiracy theory.
Best wishes,
Mike
Dear all,
I have a different yet complimentary point, and I have made it before. Somehow, it has not landed.
I am a card carrying trained mechanistic toxicologist (as well as a biochemist, at least, that’s what my degree certificate says). More relevantly, I have over 30 years experience leading new drug design teams across the disciplines.
Over the life of the pharmaceutical industry, we have collectively learned a great deal what kind of chemical and biochemical structures confer what kinds of safety and toxicity risks. We still miss things, especially when they’re not understood and all we have is harms leading to abandonment of research projects or even withdrawal of launched products. Sometimes, board level executives still don’t withdraw harmful products if they think there’s some slight or arguable uncertainty & if they think they can get away with it.
Thalidomide for example was sold in Spain deep into the 1970s, 15 years after it was unequivocally known to be a teratogen in humans. Merck didn’t withdraw their COX2 inhibitor until it was so obvious that they were more or less going to get caught. Other times, companies behaved well.
Equally, we have learned what kinds of design features confer good or poor absorption, low or high plasma protein binding, fast or slow oxidative or conjugative metabolic clearance of drugs via which pathways (hepatic to stool, renal to urine, etc). Drug disposition is perhaps the best understood to the extent there are AI systems which a century of medicinal chemistry & drug metabolism data has fed.
Toxicology is much less well understood by the industry broadly, but students of the specialist field almost all of the well understood mechanisms of toxicity. Things like aspirin, paracetamol, paraquat, rotenone, masked anilines, certain free radical generators, planar polyaromatic hydrocarbons, etc etc. I’ve forgotten so many.
One classic example was dioxin release at Seveso, Italy, which resulted in widespread harms from halogenated biphenyls, which injure us via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, a nuclear factor controlling expression or repression of numerous genes. The underlying biology is extremely complex and I don’t believe we can claim to understand it. We’re not even sure what the endogenous ligands are.
In one project in industry in which I was lead biologist, I noticed two chemistry colleagues had developed unusual facial rashes. I always pored over chemical structures, and noticed a plausible similarity between part of the new molecules that were being made & tested for this program and those industrial pollutants involved in the Italian accident. Sure enough, they had chloracne and it became a major incident, which we solved, killing the project (obviously) and teaching the industry worldwide to avoid close-in analogues.
So when I looked at the purported vaccines, I detected at least three distinct mechanisms of toxicity.
I assure you, not one of those features would have remained in molecules in the research teams armoury after the first project meeting. It wouldn’t need to be me leading it. Any of my senior staff would see the very obvious safety risks. My peers in industry would also know of them. I’ve talked about them in interviews, pieces to camera, and affidavits.
No one has tapped me on the shoulder to explain why I’ve got it all wrong. Several very clever people have independently said overlapping things, such as Professor Sucharit Bakdhi.
Others with great expertise in intracellular signalling and molecular biology quickly spotted at least two other, clearly designed-in, obviously intentional, mechanisms of toxicity (to do with nuclear localisation signals).
That makes at least five, independent, starkly obvious, in-the-structure harms. Based on at least some of these, I and doctor in Germany, Wolfgang Wodarg, wrote an open letter to the European Medicines Agency, prior to any such product being granted an Emergency Use Authorization.
We listed several concerns for the kinds of harms we expected and feared would follow from mass administration to the population. In response to this letter, the media fell upon us both, we were smeared by our national broadcasters and pushed off numerous online platforms.
Within weeks of the commencement of mass rollouts, all but one of our concerns were starkly obvious. The last one had to do with reproductive toxicity, which duly rolled in a year later.
If you choose to disregard this testimony, I don’t know what to say.
Best wishes,
Mike
The 2020 open letter
The open letter Mike Yeadon wrote in 2020 to the EMA that he mentions in his article is available online here:
It is to be noted that in this 2020 letter the claim is not made that the mRNA Pfizer vaccine is intentionally intended to harm; the problems are called “mistakes” in the letter, and he enumerates quite a few:
The trial design does not actually test vaccine efficacy, transmission, reduction in hospitalisation, ICU or death.
the vaccine is probably harmful to pregnant women, yet Pfizer has not released any directions regarding giving the vaccine to pregnant women.
the PEG lipids (Polyethylene Glycol) are known to cause antibodies in 70% of patients
Sarbeco E Reverse homology (as far as I can tell, this objection means that there is a harmful portion of the virus protein in the protein encoded in the vaccine)
there is a perfect match for one of the N-primers to a clinical pathogen (Pantoea) found in immuno-compromised patients
etc etc.
Perhaps the mRNA vaccines were not designed to harm, but it looks like they were not designed not to harm.
Maybe this seems like hair-splitting - but Mike Yeadon’s original 2020 take on this in his letter to the EMA was not that the vaccines were designed to harm, but that they were not being designed not to harm.
Getting the vaccine out into people’s arms and getting the billions of dollars/Euros/pounds into the coffers seems to have been the motive here, and I can see nothing in what Mike has said in his article that contradicts this, even now.
It was all extremely sloppy, irresponsible, and disgustingly neglectful. And the fact that Mike Yeadon warned them in his letter to the EMA puts the crime in the category of manslaughter. Having been warned, those who did this become culpable, and this is probably enough:
If, however, the bull has had the habit of goring and the owner has been warned but has not kept it penned up and it kills a man or woman, the bull is to be stoned and its owner also is to be put to death. Exodus 21:29
I don’t think we need to see this as intentional genocide, to believe that the people who did it are culpable and criminally neglectful, and committed manslaughter, maybe against millions of people.
Despite the Bible quote, I’m not calling for the death penalty here: the death penalty may be the just penalty according to Exodus, but in general I would rather err on the side of mercy.
However, we need to be aware of what really happened, and we need to make sure that it never happens again.
I beleive Yeadon. There was an entire industry and tons of money put into the possible MNRA platform so they could make vaccines without using eggs. They bet our lives on this. They deliberately chose the spike protein with its 120 HIV thingy, and most people know you don't introduce a foreign protein into a human, let alone turn the body into a foreign protein factory.....
Well look at the outcome
They sure as well don't prevent or treat COVID,
So other than just a profitable 'gesture' then it was designed to harm, or a placebo was sold to get rich, who gives a fuck?
The assholes that sold the mRNA are still alive, why are they not dead or in prison?