Claim: the mRNA vaccines were and still are experimental.
It is now abundantly clear that mRNA Vaccine mandates broke the Nuremberg code.
It is now abundantly clear that Covid vaccine coercion broke the Nuremberg code.
NBC news reported last Saturday on upcoming clinical trials to find out whether the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA injections have more adverse effects during the five years following vaccination, and they refer to the FDA approval letter to this respect, which specifically mentions a five year follow-up for the approval of these medications for children. The NBC reported that the trials will be monitoring for myocarditis and subclinical myocarditis; that is, asymptomatic myocarditis.
How could they offer a provisional approval for the vaccine in children, without first knowing this?
NBC also mention the Florida surgeon general’s report in their article, which concluded that the vaccines cause an increased risk of death in the first 28 days for men under 40, leading Florida to discontinue vaccination for under 40s men.
They also include a statement from Pfizer rubbishing the Florida report.
It is notable that the Florida report does not compare cardiac death rates in the general population with cardiac death rates among the vaccinated – it compares cardiac death rates in the first 28 days, with cardiac death rates over the entire 25 week trial period in the same group of people. This makes the result quite robust in my opinion, in demonstrating the association between vaccination and death. If the vaccines were safe, there should be no difference between risk of death in the first 28 days, when compared with 25 weeks.
In the light of other studies that demonstrate a risk of increased cardiac side effects and deaths in young people from mRNA vaccination, there is very good evidence that mRNA injections cause cardiac deaths, particularly among young men.
Australia, after mandating mRNA shots in every state with very extreme punitive coercion particularly in Western Australia, Victoria and New South Wales, has now deprecated the fifth shot for everyone except the immune compromised.
The CDC, of course, already knew more than a year ago that there was an increase in myocarditis for males in the 7 days following vaccination, particularly after dose 2.
However their more recent advice dismisses these concerns, finding that there is a very small risk even for children – however they do not seem to have been actively looking for subclinical myocarditis; something one should think they should have been doing right from the very moment there was even a suggestion that the mRNA injections cause myocarditis.
OPEN VAERS, however, seems to contradict the CDC conclusions that there is nothing to worry about.
The secret Pfizer agreement with EU member states (at least the agreement for Slovenia; it appears to be a general agreement), released after an FOI request, states quite clearly that Pfizer did not claim to know the long-term effects or efficacy of the vaccine, and that there might be adverse events that are not known. Furthermore, the agreement implies that the vaccine delivered to people might not be the same as the one initially approved; the recipient “acknowledges that the Vaccine and materials related to the Vaccine, and their components and constituent materials are being rapidly developed due to the emergency circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic,” i.e. they are still in development. (I think that’s what this phrase means)
Furthermore Pfizer executive J Small being questioned in the EU Parliament by Dutch MP Rob Roos, admitted that they did not know whether the vaccine stopped transmission when these injections were approved.
Indeed, Pfizer weren’t even trying to find out whether it stopped transmission, despite CEO Albert Bourla telling everyone it stopped transmission.
And there is plenty more evidence: Steve Kirsch has collected much of it in a recent article, including the fact that the safety signal for VAERS was triggered long ago. Indeed, the Novartis flu vaccine in Italy was cancelled in 2014 after only 13 deaths.
Despite all this evidence, there are many organisations and governments still denying that the mRNA vaccines are ineffective, dangerous, harmful and in many cases fatal, or excusing the death and danger signals as not significant, while admitting the signals are there.
But what can’t be debated is that they didn’t know what the side effects were, and in particular, they did not know what the long term side effects were. This is because they had not done the 12 year stage 3 longitudinal trials to find out.
This means that the vaccines were and are still experimental.
And this means that our governments have offended against the Nuremberg Code.
The dod has the power to make us take anything on hhs head saying so. Nuremberg code? They got rid of that and our constitution over 10 years ago and if you dont believe me go findckatherine wstts on bailiwick news on substack. She lays out what has been done legally whilexwe all slept.
"they did know what the long term side effects were" is missing "not"?... "they did NOT know..." ?
Also, you say that "the agreement implies that the vaccine delivered to people might not be the same as the one initially approved"... How does the agreement imply this? "Serialized"? Does the agreement define what this means? Thanks.
Thanks for the informative article.