Claim: "The Nuremberg Code is not law in Australia."
Seven Nazi Doctors were hanged, even though it was not law in Germany either.
I’ve heard the argument more than once that “the Nuremberg Code is not law in Australia,” usually from those with a vested interest in it not being applied to the coercion, force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, and all the ulterior forms of constraint and coercion that we were subjected to, to take experimental injections, in the Western nations during the Covid era.
Well, let me point out that the Nuremberg Code was not law in Nazi Germany either. In fact, every crime the doctors did who were tried in the Nuremberg Trials was legal at the time they did it, under the corrupt laws of Nazi Germany.
But those ethical rules they infringed while obeying the laws of Germany at the time, which were considered to be so important that they were codified by the Nuremberg prosecutors for all time, were enough to get seven Nazi doctors hanged.
There are some elite people high up in Australia who are probably feeling their necks right now, rather discomfitingly imagining where the rope might go.
NUREMBERG CODE 1
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.