https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0344033823007318
In this new, non-peer-reviewed but nonetheless excellent article, the authors outline the evidence that the Covid vaccines were a bad idea.
They give an overview of the many doubts about trial data, the fact that third phase trials have not concluded, the batch variability, the number of fines big pharma has received over the past twenty years, the slow release of trial data
Three BMJ senior editors in an article titled “COVID-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw data, now”, have called for a full release of anonymised clinical trial data, decried the slow release of data by the manufacturers Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca, and noted loss of trust “in the system” [29].
and corporate funds for vaccine mandates.
Investigative journalist Lee Fang has tracked Pfizer’s financial disclosures to discover that in the first 6 months of 2021 the company gave many $millions to more than 500 medical associations, universities, and community organisations, often for such groups to lobby for COVID-19 vaccine mandates. Virtually none of the organisations disclosed their links with Pfizer [40].
Consequences of the corruption of Medicine and Academia through conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry are enormous in both economic and health impacts.
They look at DNA integration
More recently, whole plasmid DNA and dsDNA linearised fragment contamination has been reported with high reproducibility by several laboratories around the world, at concentrations that exceed official FDA safety limits, and which raise concerns about potential genomic integration and oncogenic potential
the West Australian and Australian TGA data
Information from the Western Australia Vaccine Safety Surveillance (WAVSS) annual report 2021 has been released and notes 264 adverse events per 100,000 population, to be compared with a ‘norm’ of 11/100,000 for other vaccines [46]. More than a 20-fold increase.
They look at US excess deaths and harm to children and young people, particularly the well known myocarditis cases. And they have a paragraph about the media manipulation and suppression of the truth.
And they conclude:
We are in a unique period of medical history. Central medical assumptions are threatened. Whether the morals and ethics of individualised care, localised professional relationships between patients and their doctors, or the right to open discussion and debate of raw data and transparent scientific literature. Data on vaccine related injury and excess mortality continue to mount. Mandates, if not lifted, will become a serious political embarrassment. A survey of ours, currently in preprint, is indicative of the harms that can be caused by mandated experimental vaccines [65]. With the significant expansion of gene-based technologies already visible ahead, it is high time to reaffirm previously established medical ethics and the freedoms of the human condition.
It is a great, pithy summary of the evidence, and was written by Peter Rhodes, who conceptualised it, and Peter I Parry.
v
I had to roll my eyes on the first sentence:
"Capitalist principles of competition, efficiency and profit are supportive of innovation and knowledge growth. Unfettered, they may impinge on other human value systems. They must find balance within
strong regulatory frameworks, to protect human rights and fundamental ethical principles".
What is sorely lacking in this first paragraph, and just an educated guess-- probably the rest of the paper, is the concept of "economic fascism", "corporatism", and "moral hazard".
The Pharmaceuticals "own" these strong regulatory frameworks. At least at the CDC, funding comes primarily from the Pharmaceuticals,, themselves.
Product liability is the watchdog of product safety. If Big-Pharma "funds" the governmental safeguards, and has government protections from liability, it alters the risk-reward calculus.
This is not "unfettered capitalism"....(the bogeyman of Marxists everywhere), it's unfettered fascism. Government and Big-Pharma has a revolving door where executives and bureaucrats exchange roles constantly.
There should be a long line of lawyers lining up to put Pfizer out of business for good, and sending governmental overseers to the gallows, or at least to the Hague. *That* might be the 1st good step in preventing "bad" ideas from making it to the market place.