Opinion: Why Covid may well be the biggest medical mass murder in history
And why the scandal is still being covered up.
You don’t need a formal conspiracy when interests converge.
It was the comedian George Carlin who said, “You don’t need a formal conspiracy when interests converge.”
In 2020, it seems that the medical establishment believed that Covid was going to overrun the hospitals, and so in the US, England and Australia, a program appears to have been put into place in the hospitals and old people homes, to put old people on the ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ register, and put people in hospital with Covid onto what is basically an end of life protocol, giving respiratory disease patients Midazolam, Valium and other respiratory suppressants, in order to do away with them quickly; in Great Britain particularly this is well documented and was called the NG163 protocol. And the real reason these protocols may have been put into place appears to have been to make extra beds free.
This is all in my book, by the way, Transgenic, which I am currently in the process of revising.
That this travesty of a treatment was put into place with the collaboration and full approval of the nurses and doctors, and also the subsequent vaccination campaign, which was done with the full approval and cooperation of many people in authority across all sectors of society, is undeniable. This is why many people have a strong motivation still to deny the obvious: that the vaccines were ineffective, that they were not safe, and that they were in fact harmful in many cases, and indeed, that the whole Covid episode has been a shameful debacle that has resulted in many, many deaths. The global death count is probably in the millions and may be as many as 17-18 million, from a conservative reading of the VAERS data.
In the light of this culpability, it seems no surprise that the medical establishment and the politicians and many other people are still publicly defending the vaccines, the Covid lockdowns, and the whole debacle. When they feel threatened, groups close ranks and shut down those who are threatening them.
But in the end, those who backtrack and change direction may well save themselves.
Excess Deaths has written a great article about this:
During this interview of the UK Politician Andrew Bridgen, Bridgen outlines the reason he believes the hospital protocols were put into place:
https://rumble.com/v4e3hee-a-discussion-with-andrew-bridgen.html?start=251
Roguski: What do people need to do to get their representatives to understand that they are quite frankly culpable? — inaction in the face of awareness of a problem is not acceptable — it’s criminal. With — like you’ve mentioned — Thalidomide and many other medications — one contamination of food, if there’s a bacterial problem in food it’s removed from market immediately. You typically err on the side of caution. It seems to be that there must be some reason — I’ve learned that people do things that they feel are logical to them because they have some other issue that’s guiding them — you may not know what it is that is guiding them — but it causes them to ignore facts that you’re presenting. What possible reasons… has anyone given you a reason why they don’t want to deal with this discussion?
Bridgen: They haven’t, and apart from the fact that before I was thrown out of the Conservative Party for raising it, I had an hour and a half meeting with a Party grandee, who at this stage will remain nameless. I explained all my concerns in January 2023 about the vaccine harms and NG163 which was — it would appear would well be the euthanasia or euthanising of elderly/vulnerable out of hospital to make way for the first wave of expected Covid patients back in 2020.
And at the end of that meeting the Party Representative said to me, “Andrew there is currently no political appetite for your views on the vaccines, there may well be in 20 years’ time, and you’re probably going to be proven right then. But in the meantime you need to bear in mind that you are taking on the most powerful vested interests in the world with all the personal risks for you which that will entail”
Who set the ball of fear rolling?
The DOD appears to have been involved in the Australian rollout. Was the whole ball of fear set rolling by Fauci, at the start? — the fear that Covid was going to be far more deadly than any previous viruses — because Fauci knew that Covid had been engineered in the lab and believed that it really was going to be far more deadly than any natural virus?
This summary is near the conclusion of Andrew Bridgen’s interview:
…
Andrew Bridgen: There are so many people and members of Parliament standing down. They’ve played their part in the pantomime of a parliament we have, they’ve played their part in the vignette of this deceit of the people and they know this is the death scene. We know where they are and there will be no place to hide. It will break. They will try to hide. This is the biggest medical scandal in world history, the death toll will run to millions, and people are going to have to be held to account, and the penalties are going to have to be very severe, to regain any form of trust in science, our medical institutions and our democracy.”
At least one politician gets it. Salute to Andrew Bridgten.
Please let us know when the next edition of "Transgenic" with a table of contents and an index are available