Pfizer supports Indigenous voice in Australian Parliament
With many people Pfizer's support may well be a reason to vote "no".
Pfizer has lent their support to changing the Australian constitution to include an “Indigenous Voice” in Australian parliament.
https://www.pfizer.com.au/files/20230511MEDIARELPfIZERUluru.pdf?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
I will leave it to you, dear reader, to consider whether there must might be a tiny whiff of hypocrisy in their pledge not to rush ahead into solutions:
Pfizer began a journey of reflection three years ago which culminated in a commitment to reconciliation and the release of its Reflect Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP). As part of the journey, Pfizer recognised the importance of listening and not rushing ahead to solutions or actions.
It is perhaps a psychological truth that when people are hiding their sin, they reveal their guilty obsession in other ways. Pfizer’s statement is so applicable to their own actions that it can only be seen as a tacit admission of their own guilt.
I don’t know why Pfizer are not seeing that this expression of support might well backfire, considering the many people who now see that the Covid vaccines did not decrease transmission or stop infection and were very harmful to many people. Also, Pfizer’s support for indigenous people appears insincere considering the coercion applied to Aboriginal Christians in remote areas to take the Covid vaccines, where nearly everyone considered the injections to be a Satanic deception. Respect needs to include respecting the opinions of those with whom one disagrees. Buses were sent round to remote communities to coerce them and perhaps force them to take the injections.
An indigenous man, a friend whom I truly loved, was killed by the Covid vaccine in 2022. At the age of 64 he was one of the most healthy and strong people I’ve ever known, despite having suffered a stroke more than 20 years ago. He rode his bicycle every day for hours on end, and showed no signs of heart trouble before he died suddenly on the steps of a hospital, witnessing to Christ.
He is in heaven now, and died as a martyr, for his reason for taking the injection was that he desired greatly to return to his ministry visiting sick people and bringing them the gospel. He was determined not to take the deadly injection, for he believed it was from Satan, but pastor talked him round and convinced him that the Covid vaccines were not from Satan, but a beneficial technology. His pastor I say completely without irony is a true Christian, but on this issue has been deceived.
Many people now do not trust the government, particularly Aboriginal people, and with good reason considering even the recent past.
Pfizer has not helped and they need to shut up, because any social capital they might have ever has already been spent. The only social capital they have now is deep, deep indebtedness, a debt that has yet to be paid.
God in His justice will ensure that one day such institutional debt will be paid in full, to the very last penny. There is forgiveness in Christ for individuals, but for institutions? I think not. When the reckoning comes any company that is found to have killed people with their fraudulent products should be disbanded completely and every penny of their assets given to those who were injured by the pharmakea and those who lost income because of the coercion. Officials and company directors should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law for any crimes they are found to have done.
If justice is not satisfied in this life, we can be sure it will be in the next.
While many of us wish for institutional fairness for Aboriginal people in Australia, in the context of the WEF and WHO Great Reset this push for changes to the Australian constitution has to be viewed with suspicion, and Pfizer’s support will only make many of us consider this whole proposal with even more suspicion.
In conclusion, perhaps Pfizer needs to read their own statement carefully:
Rebekah Barnett’s post alerted me to this:
It may be that Pfizer actually opposes whatever that political item down under happens to be - and knows that their support will help alienate people's support? I don't know enough about it all to say... But I think that grave injustice has been done indigenous people there, just as has happened in the Americas and everywhere else, by alleged Christians and colonists. In Palestine it's Christians and Zionists (often, Jews in rebellion against the almighty and Jewish Law, who reject the Torah, and sometimes atheists/ assimilationists), but it's the same dynamic.
If Pfizer says that sky is blue, or denies that, does it really change anything? It is, or it isn't.