Propaganda: the BBC program “UNVAXXED”
The BBC fails to report on both sides of the issue, and fails to challenge the incorrect assertions and conflicts of interest of their Big Pharma-friendly guests. Why am I not surprised?
Below I have summarised the main points Professor Norman Fenton makes in Maajid Nawaz’s interview with him about the BBC program “Unvaxxed,” in which the BBC failed to correct incorrect assertions by their big pharma guests, failed to mention these guests’ conflicts of interest, and edited out the reasons the unvaccinated guests did not want to get vaccinated and the data they quoted to support their decision.
1) The explanations of the unvaccinated people as to why they did not take the vaccine, were edited out of the show, including the supporting data that they cite. Additionally, the BBC’s figures were wrong: the BBC claim a small minority of people are unvaccinated; probably at least 26% of people in Great Britain are unvaccinated. They laugh about how the BBC usually wants to amplify the opinions of minorities; why is this any different?
2) The BBC implied that Adam Finn was an independent expert. He was comparing Pfizer and Moderna to Astra Zeneca. Adam Finn claimed to be acting as a buffer between these companies and the public.
But Professor Adam Finn is not independent at all: he is actually the head of the Pfizer Centre for Excellence for Epidemiology of Vaccine preventable diseases.
The BBC program completely failed to declare this conflict of interest.
3) Asma Kahlil explained why it was important for pregnant women to get the vaccine. She was the head of the Pfizer pregnant women trial.
The BBC program failed to declare her conflict of interest
4) The psychologist has had many grants from the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation.
5) A discussion about fact-checkers (!) The fact checkers are unqualified and do not fact check the ridiculously exaggerated claims of the authorities, such as that the vaccines are safe and effective.
6) Biden got Covid twice despite Biden’s claims that if you take the vaccine you will not get Covid.
7) None of the false claims made by Adam Finn were fact checked by the BBC. Adam Finn claimed that people who were vaccinated had stronger immunity than those who were unvaccinated and had caught the infection. That should have been challenged. The weight of evidence contradicts that: unvaccinated people who have natural immunity have a much stronger immunity.
8) Asma Kahlil’s claim that the vaccine was completely safe for pregnant women, would increase their general health and immunity greatly, and would reduce the risk of miscarriage by 15%. There is actually an increased risk of miscarriage for the vaccinated. She should not have been allowed to air that claim without being challenged. Particularly in view of her conflict of interest.
9) Asma Kahlil claimed myocarditis rates are 1 in 33,000, and myocarditis rates are the most common adverse event. Myocarditis rates are higher than this (my note: at least 1 in 10,000 according to the Big Pharma documents themselves, higher for the Astra Zeneca). The German government recently said there are 1 in 5000 serious adverse reactions, but German data seems to suggest there’s actually 1 in 300 serious adverse reactions.
10) Jellybeans example: they used jellybeans to compare the risk of dying from the vaccine to the risk of dying from Covid. For young people like those on the show, you’d have to have millions of jellybeans to get that one death. Many people have lost their life due to the Astra Zeneca vaccine; court cases in England have confirmed this to be the case. Using jellybeans to represent lives lost is completely insensitive. Right at the beginning when Hannah Fry asked Nazarin if she had known anyone who had died from the vaccine, they claimed Nazarin didn’t know about this person until she started protesting. In fact Nazarin had close family members who died soon after taking the vaccine, including her own grandmother - this was edited out from the program. Norman Fenton says the BBC wanted to completely ignore and dehumanise the victims of the vaccine.
11) All of the national ICU data certainly actually already suggests that vaccinated people are suffering a higher rate of hospitalisation from Covid than the unvaccinated. Norman Fenton believes that the people they are defining as unvaccinated are probably not really unvaccinated, but those who only had two jabs and not the booster - they are doing more FOI requests to determine if this is the case.
12) Those that took the Covid jab - if they suffered deaths (and almost certainly hospitalisation) within two weeks of the vaccination - they recorded those deaths and hospitalisation as unvaccinated. This is because the Covid jab is not efficacious for the first two weeks, and they are recording all statistics of those 14 days after vaccination as unvaccinated, not only for the purposes of recording Covid cases, but also for the purposes of recording deaths and hospitalisations caused by the vaccine. (My note - this is something I’ve suspected for a while, and if it is true - which I think it is - it means every government assertion about the safety of the vaccine from Australia, England, Canada, US, and anywhere else where they follow this dubious statistical practice, is completely unreliable.)
13) Many PCR positive people never developed symptoms and never developed Covid.
14) Anyone who tested positive for Covid while in hospital, or who died within 28 days of a PCR positive test, was classified as a Covid hospitalisation or death, regardless of the real cause of their hospitalisation. Norman Fenton’s FOI: 130,000 official Covid deaths, only 6,000 had Covid listed on death certificate as the sole cause. In that 2 year period only 7 people in the non-senior age group died of Covid.
Following the interview with Norman Fenton, Maajid Nawaz interviews two of the unvaccinated guests who appeared on the BBC show, Vicky Borman and Nazarin Veronica, and Norman Fenton joins him for part of these interviews.
https://odysee.com/@MaajidNawaz:d/RadicalEpisode15:b
Uncorrected, biased propaganda hall of fame
The BBC for their show “Unvaxxed” - this is a particularly grievous case, since they pick on average, ordinary people, whom they have asked to appear on the show apparently under false pretences, and who happen to be in the right, and use biased, compromised “experts” whose conflicts of interest are not declared, to try to shame these ordinary, everyday guests into changing their mind about a health issue. The BBC who ought to know better, who ought to subscribe to the highest standards of accuracy, are here caught behaving far worse than the worst tabloid journalists.