I wish to raise some points about Mr Flint’s divisive article about ‘anti-vaxxers’ on the 2nd October 2020. This letter was sent to the editor of the Sunday Times, however it was not published, and I am concerned that the misinformation purveyed by Mr. John Flint will be allowed to let stand, so I am sending this to first fact check in the hopes that it will be published on a reputable website that actually cares about truth.
Saying that Voluntary Consent in Essential does not make you an “anti-vaxxer.”
Firstly, in his article Mr. Flint uses the divisive term ‘anti-vaxxers.’
FirstFactCheck is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Most people who oppose compulsory coerced mRNA injections are not ‘anti-vaxxers’- they are mainstream Australians who know that coercive medical treatments are unethical and immoral, see the Nuremberg Code, the declaration of Helsinki, the Australian constitution (re medical conscription), and the Hippocratic oath and the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986, Schedule 2, Article 7 which states: “No one shall be subjected… without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.”
The first line of the Nuremberg Code says:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
The mRNA injections are experimental
The mRNA injections in particular are not vaccines in the traditional sense, but an experimental medication.
A medical trial for a new medication should last twelve years and must include longitudinal studies. These medications are still experimental, and the recently released documents Pfizer tried to keep secret for 75 years prove that they did many unethical things to twist the data to get the BNT162b2 injection approved. They recorded a case of paralysis and permanent injury in a child, Maddie di Garay, as nausea, they hid deaths and injuries from the FDA submission, and they had five times as many exclusions in the treatment arm as the placebo arm.
This is not a hard right freedom movement.
Anyway, considering that over 80% of Australians have declined the fourth jab, I hardly think those not taking the jab are part of a hard-right ‘freedom movement’, unless you want to label 80% of Australians with this insult. There are many left wing people too, in the anti-medical coercion movement; many unionists and even greens.
And Monica Smit is certainly not extreme, except to people who are on the extreme left whose values do not match the values of ordinary Australians.
Flint also claims that Reignite Democracy’s Monica Smit is in Europe to try to maintain her relevance. She is actually there because her videos have a massive world-wide appeal.
1.9% didn’t take it, means 98.1% were coerced and/or lied to
As for the observation that only 1.9% of Australians refused the jab; the great majority of people took the injections because they were coerced, in order to keep their job, or to visit ageing parents, or family members in hospital.
What this figure of 1.9% actually means is that a massive 98.1% of Australians were coerced into taking a medical treatment against their will.
The mandates have not ended: health workers still unable to go back to work
And Flint claims the mandates have ended - he overlooks the fact that unvaccinated health workers are still unable to go back to work in Western Australia.
Covid-19 not the deadliest in 100 years.
And Covid-19 was, according to Flint, the deadliest health emergency in 100 years, yet the mean age of death from Covid-19 was over 84 and the mean life-expectancy of Australians is around 81.
Klaus Schwab wants $2.5 trillion - what for?
Flint says people’s concerns about Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum are conspiracy theories.
The annual budget of the WEF is over US$1 billion, and they tell us in “From Funding To Financing” that they need an extra US$2.5 trillion; to do what, exactly? Those who went through Klaus Schwab’s youth indoctrination program include Jacinda Ardern, Emmanuelle Macron, Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Angela Merkel, Boris Johnson, Jimmy Wales of Wikipedia, Justin Trudeau, most members of the Canadian cabinet, Scott Morrison, and Joe Hockey, and even Vladimir Putin, etc etc etc. When we hear all these people (except Putin and Musk perhaps) singing from the same song sheet, we have to suspect they’re all in the same choir.
The evidence points to SARS-COV2 being a man made virus.
Andrea Tokaji apparently said that “she knew at the outset of the pandemic that this was a man-made virus, that was going to be used to take away our freedoms and our rights, and implement a communist ideology.”
Well, it probably was a man-made virus. The UK Science and Technology Select Committee conducted an inquiry in December 2021 into the origins of the Coronavirus: the evidence pointed to the virus coming from the Wuhan Lab. The first cases occurred in the lab employees’ residential district. They interviewed the editor of the journal Lancet, Richard Horton, who confessed to ignoring and suppressing evidence that the virus originated in the Wuhan lab.
Peer-reviewed studies funded by the NIH in Wuhan going back to 2013 reveal that the Wuhan lab was indeed working on gain of function. Peter Daszak, who wrote and signed the letter published in Lancet in February 2020 calling the Wuhan lab leak a conspiracy theory, was exposed as having a large conflict of interest, because his organisation Eco-Health Alliance used NIH funding to collaborate with Chinese scientists on gain of function research in the Wuhan lab.
Richard Horton, clearly under pressure in his testimony, eventually admitted that it took them over a year to persuade Daszak to declare his full competing interest.
What punishment does Flint think is appropriate for leaders who coerce others to take experimental medications?
Then Mr. Flint pointed out that Riccardo Bosi calls for those involved in the “COVID hoax” to be hung; Mr Bosi begins this video by pointing out that Nazi doctors actually were hung for performing coercive medical experiments on the Jews in WWII. Perhaps Mr. Flint is feeling his neck right now, wondering if he would be on Mr. Bosi’s list for the noose? But what punishment does Mr. Flint think is appropriate for coercing 98.1% of the population into submitting to a dangerous medical experiment?
I support Mr Flint’s right to say what he wants, as I believe in freedom of speech. But I suppose if that is the case, he should also respect Mr. Bosi’s right to say what he wants.
13 deaths cancelled the Novartis flu vaccine in Italy
Mr. Flint also says that in August the Vaccination Risks Network claimed that more people had died from the vaccination than from the virus.
Flint then points out that the TGA says only 13 deaths were linked to vaccination.
Let me point out that Italy in 2014 cancelled the Novartis influenza vaccine over only 13 deaths.
And what is rather amazing about this figure of 13 deaths is that the TGA’s own DAEN database of vaccine reactions records 939 deaths.
939 deaths, perhaps? TGA conflict of interest.
Considering that the TGA may have a slight conflict of interest, in that they might have every reason to want to claim that the vaccine they coerced everyone into taking is safe, one wonders if they are the best people to be assessing whether the 939 deaths that were submitted by health professionals and patients really were related to the vaccine, or not.
Underreporting in the DAEN database is a distinct probability as well: the recent release of the data from the CDC’s v-safe app reveals that the true underreporting factor for VAERS in the US is around 140. VAERS themselves in a study admitted to an underreporting factor of 6.5, in which they specifically requested that the people in the study make a VAERS report.
About 5,000 unexplained excess deaths in the ABS report of June 2022 need to be explained; that they might have been caused by the vaccine is reasonable considering all the facts I’ve just outlined, even at an underreporting factor of 5.
The TGA also deprecates Ivermectin, which has been proven to be 92% effective in a very large study in Brazil, and which caused the Uttar Pradesh death rate from Covid to plummet to zero.
Considering the large conflicts of interest of those on the TGA vaccine advisory board, which are not declared on the board’s webpage – the chair Professor Allen Cheng has personally received payments and grants from pharmaceutical companies, Professor Joseph Torresi works at the Doherty Institute which has received millions of dollars from Pfizer, the NIH, and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Professor Kristine Macartney is on the WHO Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety – one wonders how they can possibly have enough objectivity to be trusted.
TGA website itself indicates men under 40 shouldn’t be taking the vaccine, and Florida agrees
Also considering that only 1 child in Australia had died of Covid up to January of 2022 (the government statistics after this do not distinguish under 18s since then, in fact, so I couldn’t find if there have been any more deaths of children) giving myocarditis to 13 in 100,000 boys seems to cruel in the extreme. Yes, 13/100,000 teenaged boys and 20/100,000 men in their 20s get myocarditis from the vaccine, according to the TGA webpage that Mr Flint quotes. One wonders why he neglects to mention those damning statistics? Only 41 men in the 20-40 age group have died of Covid in Australia, which equals a chance of 0.14 in 100,000 of dying. So for every life that might have been saved, a great many more men will die, as myocarditis is not a mild condition - out of 780 myocarditis patients in a study in Taiwan, a quarter had died within ten years. Furthermore, the TGA is almost certainly underestimating the rate of myocarditis, even in their higher estimates for teenagers and men, because a recent study in Thailand, Mansanguan et al, found that 29% of adolescent recipients of the vaccine had cardiovascular side-effects.
Florida, after a government sponsored study that found an 88% higher rate of heart attacks in young people after Covid vaccination, has cancelled the vaccine for under 40s.
Despite claims to the contrary, these side-effects have not been found in Covid in any reliable studies. And according to the ABS data, most of the people in Australia who died from Covid had pre-existing serious chronic health conditions.
Covid deaths of the unvaccinated exaggerated in statistics.
Throughout his article, Mr Flint mentions the dreadful rates of the Covid deaths of the unvaccinated. These figures are almost certainly inflated. A December 2021 study by Martin Neil, Norman Elliott Fenton, Joel Smalley and Clare Elizabeth Honor Craig shows in figure 15, how the categorisation of people in the first 14 days after vaccination as unvaccinated results in their deaths being recorded as the deaths of unvaccinated people. This artificially inflates the death figures for unvaccinated people - as in fact, you are more likely to die of Covid in the first 14 days after vaccination, as your immune system takes a hit.
This is why hospitals say you should not in fact get vaccinated, if you have recently caught Covid.
This calls into question all the figures Mr. Flint quotes with glee, as there is no reason to believe that Australia has avoided this statistical error - I believe it is true that people here are also recorded as unvaccinated in the first 14 days after vaccination. If this is not true the government should make the raw data available, including how many days since vaccination.
In any case, people who have recovered from Covid have an enduring 100% immunity, that does not wane even after two years. The immunity conferred by the vaccines begins at around 88% and descends into negative territory after only 3 months.
What a shame, Mr. Flint, that I have to do your investigative reporting for you.
Divisiveness.
And you really should be ashamed for writing such a divisive article, that demonises the unvaccinated at the very time when we are just getting back to normal life and our jobs and just starting to recover from the experience of - as perfectly healthy people - being forced into unjust solitary quarantine and the loss of months of income by a stubborn, nasty government and their unjust, illegal, unethical, unscientific mandates.
Let me say, however, that I don’t agree with Mr. Bosi. I have no wish to see anyone hung.
Do you really want to be on the receiving end of 98.1% of the Australian population’s anger?
But when you are part of a group of people justifying a series of unjust mandates that resulted in 98.1% of the Australian population taking a medical treatment that they didn’t want, that they only submitted to in order to keep their jobs or to be able to continue to visit their ageing relatives or to be able to travel, you had better think twice before you start whipping up division and nastiness. History shows that those who whip up vitriol and hatred frequently end up being the victims of that nastiness in the end.
98.1% of the Australian population, Mr Flint, have been forced into receiving these jabs.
Do you really want to end up being on the receiving end of their wrath?
From a reader.
CHANGE LOG
changed nastiness to anger in headline (my headlines)
FirstFactCheck is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.