There seems to me to be little doubt now that there are excess deaths in the past two years and that these are temporally associated with vaccination, strongly suggesting causality. The question arises, how culpable were our governments and health authorities for this medical disaster? Is Meryl Nass correct: did they hide the origins of COVID in order that they could kill lots of people?
I believe that it is irrefutable that the culture of death that has been steadily growing in our society, both with regard to readily available abortion (up to birth in Western Australia, with the signature of two doctors, who might well be working at the abortion clinic where the dreadful deed is to be done) and euthanasia on demand, together with the worries many have about population growth and climate change, mean that some of those elites who are running things – whilst apparently not actively seeking to murder anyone in particular – might yet consider the deaths of many people acceptable collateral damage from a mass medical experiment, since these deaths – as my hypothetical elites see it – believe that they are helping to save the planet, if many people happen to accidentally die. In other words, I wonder if they might not be taking as seriously as they might the possibility of excess deaths, because deep down they really believe there are too many people on this planet?
I’m not sure it goes beyond that level of culpability; but that is still culpable. That is still manslaughter.
In any case, I believe that before we accuse anyone, we need to have evidence that all of this was intentional and planned. I am not sure we are at that point yet.
Nonetheless I believe there is enough evidence from Naomi Wolf’s Daily Clout, the Pfizer releases, other FOIs and whistleblowers, to say that the Big Pharma companies and governments (at least, the FDA, anyhow) knew about the excess deaths and vaccine harms very early on; I have outlined much of this evidence in my book. Or at least they should have known, if they were doing their homework properly. Did the people at the top simply trust that those doing the lab work and writing the studies were getting it right? Was it just terminal stupidity and sloppiness, both on the part of governments and big Pharma and the scientists, who were so used to twisting data to get approvals that they didn’t even think twice? And when they feel they’re on a righteous crusade, it might well blind them to evidence that things were not as glowingly pure as they wished to believe. Pride comes before the fall.
On the other hand, some of our leaders may have considered that the risk that these medical experiments might kill people was worth it, considering the danger of COVID-19, if they privately knew that COVID was created in a lab to be an extremely virulent biological weapon.
But the health authorities don’t seem to have had any worries about causing mass panic and mass fear; why would the extra step of admitting COVID was created in a lab matter so much?
Perhaps because no one would have then accepted the vaccines.
But then, why was it necessary to convince everyone to get vaccinated? Was it simply big Pharma profits that were at stake?
On the face of it, that hypothesis seems logical, because some of the big Pharma companies over the years appear to have been getting more and more sloppy, doing their phase one, two and three trials simultaneously (this was never the intention of the standard three phase trial process: it was meant to ensure that in vitro and animal trials revealed problems before a medication was tested on humans), being free and easy with their trial data, using competing medicines or toxic ingredients as placebos instead of saline, to say nothing of the ease with which the equally sloppy government regulators approved suspect medications because conflicts of interest and big Pharma influence. We shouldn’t lump them all together, though; Bayer stopped their vaccine development possibly because they knew they couldn’t do it safely.
I can easily see how the elites pushing the vaccines could get caught up in all the excitement, though; such was the vilification poured out against the unvaccinated and the righteous anger extended towards the vaccine skeptics, that these people could easily be blinded to the facts that were staring them in the face. After all, righteous anger against one’s own shadow - that is, against the people whom one hates – is a great human pleasure, that can blind a person completely. May God have mercy on us and preserve us from such devilish pleasures.
I saw this depicted quite graphically recently in two short videos juxtaposed, the first video was of a Palestinian man (I presume he was Palestinian) saying “Allahu Akbar” in great, ecstatic, righteous, religious joy, as the rockets shot over his head towards his enemies in Israel.
The second video of the same man, weeping and disconsolate, in a hospital, himself bloodied and bandaged, with the cries of his wounded neighbours even women and children in the background, as he looked around at the consequences of the Israeli reprisal. Did he ever understand, though, that this fate was what he wished on others?
The image of the Man dying on the cross comes to my mind, then: the innocent Son of God. He took the consequences of human sinfulness in His own body, and died, and rose again, and therein is the only hope for humankind, that there really is a God, that there really is justice, but that the justice of God is to suffer for love of us and is, indeed, mercy. What will come of all of this I do not know. But I know one thing: God sees. God understands. God has not forgotten us.
Petra you are missing the point, while pointing the finger...the very thing the author is trying to say we are all capable of. The point is when we try to put ourself in the seat as 'gods' we fail to empathise, we dont see because of plank in our own eye. There is only one qualified to judge and we should leave that to the Almighty!
Do you necessarily believe the images of the Palestinian man though? I mean, really? Do you have a link?