There is currently an inquiry in the Covid response of the West Australian government.
ExcessDeathsAU alerted me to this
Submissions must be in by March 15th.
Submissions cannot be anonymous, which could be a problem. Do we trust them? Is this just a method of getting the dissidents out of the woodwork as Stalin did? I’m afraid I do not trust this government, but hopefully their intentions are not that evil just yet; I know some of the ministers in this government personally. I don’t believe they are going down that road. But I might be wrong.
Nonetheless I do believe a submission needs to be made with proper references and and careful wording. If anyone in Western Australia wants to help me please contact me in the comments or at firstfactcheck (ΑΤ) protonmail.com
The rules governing whether the submissions are admitted are here, and unfortunately probably rule out any submission questioning the legality of coerced vaccination.
I suspect that saying that the Government offended against the Nuremberg code might be considered by the gatekeepers defamatory or insulting (see the ‘important things to consider’ below), and quite possibly mentioning the employment restrictions might also rule this out because the rules say they won’t consider anything before the courts (I think some of the employment mandates are before the courts right now.).
It is, in other words, the perfect time to make a whitewash of it all. Well, the white won’t wash, in the end. God sees everything. He will judge.
Nonetheless, perhaps we can get around this by mentioning not the employees being mandated, but the employers, who were actually coerced by threatened fines into coercing their employees.
And nonetheless, even if it doesn’t make it through, something needs to be submitted to this at this time, so that none of them can say that no one told them.
This is the list of “important things to consider”from the government submission webpage:
The review panel will consider submissions that address some, or all, of the terms of reference.
If information in your submission does not relate to the terms of reference, it will not be considered.
Questions have been provided to help you consider your experiences in the context of the terms of reference.
There is no specific template to follow when making a submission. However, the questions below are provided to help guide your submission.
Your submission will not be considered if it contains any obscene, offensive, derogatory or discriminatory language, is defamatory, or if it refers to any matters currently before a court.
Your submission in its entirety will not be published, but information within your submission may be referred to or included in the review’s final report.
Anonymous submissions, fictitious names and pseudonyms will not be accepted.
One Question in particular seems to provide scope to question the legality:
1. How well prepared was the WA Government for COVID-19 when it arrived? Was the WA Government Pandemic Plan fit for purpose?
What the submission needs to say.
The Western Australian government offended against the Nuremberg code, etc.
The West Australian government offended against the Nuremberg code, the Human Rights Act 2004, the Declaration of Helsinki 1964, the 1985 international human rights treaty, and the Australian Constitution when they threatened businesses to make them force their employees to be injected with an experimental medication or lose their jobs.
Section 10(2) of the Human Rights Act 2004 says that: No-one may be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation or treatment without his or her free consent.
That these injections were medical experimentation becomes crystal clear in light of the subsequent evidence that the injections caused side effects that were unknown at the time, that despite government assurance the injections did nothing to prevent infection or transmission of the virus, that they damaged people’s immune systems so that they are more likely to catch Covid the more shots that they have had, that they caused a suppression of IgG3 response to Covid and a heightened IgG4 response making the body less sensitive to the virus, that they boosted PD-L1 response causing a susceptibility to immune disorders.
And that the injections caused myocarditis, pericarditis, and caused an apparent spike in excess deaths.
The DAENS database contains over 900 deaths linked by the doctors who submitted them to the Covid injections.
But even if the injections had worked exactly as advertised, the Western Australian government would still have been offending against the Nuremberg code, etc, by coercing them, simply because neither the government nor the companies providing the injections nor the TGA nor any health authorities in Australia or America or the WHO actually knew what the outcome or effect of these injections would be: there were only two previous mRNA gene therapy vaccines, for Ebola virus and Zika virus, and both of these were actually disasters for the human subjects involved, and the current mRNA injections were new technology; they were touted as new technology, and were only allowed under Emergency Use Authorisation, meaning that they were experimental.
The phase three trials for an experimental medical treatment are should last for seven to twelve years. This is an established fact, and calling it “Operation Warp Speed” or saying that we had to “Operate at the speed of science” does not change this fact.
Despite government assertions to the contrary the injections were not tested to see if they stopped transmission of the disease.
Furthermore, there were highy effective treatments available at the time these experimental treatments were coerced: Hydroxychloroquine and Zinc, Ivermectin and Zinc for which there are over 160 studies, some very large, that prove effectiveness, Vitamin D, and Iodine Povadine gargle.
Quarantining people with no symptoms of a disease is unjust imprisonment and offends against the constitution and human rights agreements that Australia has signed in the past.
Quarantining healthy people with no symptoms and no medical evidence indicating that they have a disease is an offense against human rights. It is unjust imprisonment, and offends against every principle of quarantine, indeed, even the earliest, which is found in the Bible in the book of Leviticus and involves a very strict method of establishing that someone is sick before they may be quarantined.
Holy smokes we are sympatico. I just wrote about this.
https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/genocide-denial-now-occurring-in
Same old argument, the Nuremberg Code has no legal standing in Australia or elsewhere. Not sure it is a good idea to reference it in a submission.