Australian TGA trashes webpage saying the vaccines weren't rushed through

I will leave it to the reader to decide why the TGA got rid of this webpage, which claimed that the approvals were not rushed.

Here is how the webpage appeared a year ago:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220505160650/https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/is-it-true/is-it-true-were-covid-19-vaccines-rushed-through-approvals-or-given-emergency-use-authorisations-in-australia

Here is the page as it appears now:

https://web.archive.org/web/20230513090547/https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/covid-19-vaccines/is-it-true/is-it-true-were-covid-19-vaccines-rushed-through-approvals-or-given-emergency-use-authorisations-in-australia

Is this because of the February 2023 FOI request document release?

I’m sure it doesn’t have anything to do with the recent release of the only decent sized Pfizer BNT162b2 approval document they could find in response to an FOI request. In this document the data doesn’t match the text, a document that clearly looks rushed because it still had track changes enabled when they made the pdf version.

Their claim that Australia doesn’t have “Emergency Use Authorization” on that old webpage is untrue anyhow, because the TGA has “Provisional Approval” instead, which to all extents and purposes amounts to the same thing, at least insofar as I can tell.