Fact check: Births in Australia are down in 2021, 9 months after the vaccination
According to the ABS, births are not down in 2021.
This image has been circulating online:
However, the ABS data appears to have been incomplete at that time.
The original source of the image, tweet author @LCHF_Matt, deleted his tweet soon after, after someone pointed out that only a small percentage of the Australian population had actually been vaccinated in March 2021.
In saying “vaccinating 2% of the population”, the tweet replier is basically correct: vaccinations didn’t begin until 15th March 2021 in Australia. By April 4 2021, 841,885 vaccine doses had been administered. This represents more like 3% of Australians, but even so…
Even by July, in Australia vaccination rates were low for young people in Australia of the age of child-bearing, definitely less than 20%:
Unless the ABS is telling fibs, these figures show an increase in births in 2021; maybe the lockdowns resulted in more births?
I myself actually downloaded the ABS figures for 2021 in mid November this year, 2022) on a spreadsheet and it matched the original tweet, but obviously the figures must have been wrong.
The page with the incorrect figures is still up on the ABS Beta data explorer with the incorrect figures, however, with a disclaimer if you hover above the December 2021 field:
It’s no use archiving this page of course, on archive.org’s wayback machine, though, because you get this:
This is the kind of result one gets for nearly every .gov.au statistical site that I’ve looked at lately on archive.org’s wayback machine.
Still, it’s probably mistakes and incomplete data…
Nonetheless, I am more inclined at this stage to assume mistakes and incomplete data than fibs and lower birth rates, particularly considering the low vaccination rate in Australia nine months in March 2021.
The ABS hasn’t released the registered birth figures for 2022 yet; however, considering that the mistaken tweet from the incomplete 2021 figures is still circulating, it is not unreasonable to assume that this tweet itself is the reason the ABS won’t release their 2022 figures until they have them all in this time.
Of course until we see the 2022 figures, we won’t know if there has been a drop in births since a large number of young people in Australia got injected with the gene therapy.
Whilst the lower birth numbers from Sweden in 2022 are concerning (thanks to El Gato Malo), perhaps there is a similar time lag in the reporting of registered births?
The problem is, I no longer trust government organisations to tell the truth.
The problem is, I myself can’t get over Unitaid’s Andrew Hill lying at the behest of some important person high up (rather coincidentally one of the the biggest funders of Unitaid is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation), and the TGA and the CDC lying about ivermectin’s efficacy in 2020 and 2021, and the FDA’s lying horse dewormer tweet. And the 20 ex-FBI and intelligence people who lied about the Hunter Biden laptop, who still haven’t apologised or even admitted that they were wrong. And the dodgy figures from the Bureau of Meteorology in Australia since they stopped publishing their methods of adjustment in 2013. And the twitter files, showing the lengths the FBI and the Biden have gone to, and are still going to, to suppress the truth.
If all these government organisations have lied, to protect themselves from scrutiny, why not others? So far there has been no accountability for any of these lies.
Be a little skeptical, but not concerned.
Accordingly I would be a little skeptical about birth figures until we can verify them from multiple sources. Let’s not be concerned, just yet though.
The fact is that we don’t know, and the most important thing is to know exactly what it is you don’t know.
Covid vaccination and menstrual irregularities - is concerning.
What actually is concerning, though, is the association between Covid vaccination numbers and web searches for menstrual irregularities associated with vaccination, in Canada, UK, USA and Australia, as published in Nature magazine:
CHANGELOG
3:19am on Thursday 8 December
corrected a few errors:
@LCHF_Matt was not the source of the 2% remark, but someone replying to him.
Also I had typed none months instead of nine months.
It was early in the morning! Woke up, couldn’t sleep at 2am, thought I’ll just do a fact check on something.