Coercing Australian citizens to take an experimental medication was a clear infringement of the Nuremberg Code1:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
That the mRNA Covid vaccines were experimental2 is becoming more and more abundantly clear. The mRNA transcription process skips over the Methyl-1-Psuedouridine and creates random proteins3, a process that could create harmful prions, the agents of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. There were fragments of DNA in the RNA in the injection and these fragments included SV-40, a cancer-causing agent4.
The Covid Vaccines were only approved by the FDA under Emergency Use Approval (EUA) - the TGA page saying approval was not rushed (which has since disappeared from the internet) contained a clear lie, because Provisional Approval is essentially the same as EUA5.
Note that even if someone took the AstraZeneca vaccine (which was later removed for safety issues) they would still have had to take an mRNA booster.
Prime Minister Scott Morrison and the Federal Government clearly approved of and enabled the policy of coercing Australians to take the Covid vaccinations by threatening them with loss of jobs (“no jab no pay” and “as mandatory as possible” ) a policy which was recommended by the AHPPC6 and Scott Morrison and put into force by State Governments7 - in October 2021 the Cabinet discussed employment mandates but did not follow through.
Nonetheless it is arguable that the Federal Government had a duty to stop the states from infringing the Australian Constitution: medical conscription is clearly not allowed. The Constitution disallows ‘medical conscription’ in Section 51 (xxiiiA); in the High Court in 1949 it was decided this means no medical coercion is allowed by direct or indirect means.
By warning Doctors in March 2021 they would be deregistered if they questioned Covid vaccines8 the Federally legislated body AHPRA infringed on patient rights to informed consent with regard to Covid vaccination. This was a serious breach of the Nuremberg Code as well, especially considering the large number of disabilities and deaths that resulted9 and the likelihood that Australian excess deaths in 2022 and 2023 were related to Covid vaccination 10.
The TGA approval process for the Covid vaccine was, quite frankly, abysmally inadequate. The only document examined by the TGA for approval of the Pfizer vaccines was a sloppy document that still had track changes enabled, and that demonstrated that the Lipid Nanoparticles of the Pfizer vaccines did not stay at the injection site in rats, but spread throughout the body, particularly to the ovaries. The track changes revealed their indecision concerning the safety of the vaccine with regard to pregnancy, and seems to indicate they were recommending it as safe, without evidence11.
In the past it has taken more than one inquiry / Royal Commission to get to the facts12. I hope those conducting this inquiry will honestly look at the evidence that wrong was done, for the sake of their own future reputations, and, indeed, for the sake of their own immortal souls (Mark 8:36).
Andrew P Partington is the author of “Transgenic” https://www.amazon.com.au/TRANSGENIC-Humanised-synthetic-SARS-CoV2-vaccines/dp/B0CK44F1MF
Last day for submissions - portal here: https://www.pmc.gov.au/covid-19-response-inquiry/consultation
Mulroney, T.E., Pöyry, T., Yam-Puc, J.C. et al. N1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes +1 ribosomal frameshifting. Nature (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06800-3
Legislation is not available from WA parliament website but can be downloaded here: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/api/v1/file/fff6eb56-635e-4e85-86a0-45ed0aeac4a1.pdf
The TGA says “only 13 deaths were linked to vaccination. Let me point out that Italy in 2014 cancelled the Novartis influenza vaccine over only 13 deaths. And what is rather amazing about this figure of 13 deaths is that the TGA’s own DAEN database of vaccine reactions records 939 deaths. Considering that the TGA may have a slight conflict of interest, in that they might have every reason to want to claim that the vaccine they coerced everyone into taking is safe, one wonders if they are the best people to be assessing whether the 939 deaths that were submitted by health professionals and patients really were related to the vaccine, or not. Underreporting in the DAEN database is a distinct probability as well: the recent release of the data from the CDC’s v-safe app reveals that the true underreporting factor for VAERS in the US is around 140. VAERS themselves in a study admitted to an underreporting factor of 6.5, in which they specifically requested that the people in the study make a VAERS report.” (First Fact Check) In fact there are more than 939 deaths recorded in DAEN now.
FOI TGA document 6, the Nonclinical Evaluation Report BNT162b2 [mRNA] COVID-19 vaccine (COMIRNATY™) Submission No: PM-2020-05461-1-2 Sponsor: Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd January 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20230204175226/https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf
http://www.minutesofevidence.com.au/the-coranderrk-story/ There were actually several Coranderrk inquiries, but the last one got at the full story.
As above - so Down Under.
(I keep saying this). You state All this very clearly. Well said.
It's worse than that though. To describe them as "experimental" flatters them. They're often viewed as experimental as they share certain characteristics - unfinished, unrefined, not completely understood... etc
But if you describe them as "experimental" it implies that someone is doing an experiment, which would involve a thoughtful design, and careful collection of relevant data. In fact the design of the program, and collection of data are such as to obscure learning about the impact of the injections. ... Inevitably, since that was not the intent.