There is also the small issue called China ..... and the Wuhan Institute. Whilst obviously being a place to have a SARS COV lab close by to all the areas of where the original SARS came about one would be totally stupid not to think that CCP interest would be circulating. Since Fauci was known to have visited the CIA in person ( entry not recorded at super secure CIA offices ) one could logically think that perhaps biodefence interests would be percolating too. BARDA was definitely involved. The “ billionaire “ thru his pet org called GAVI ( also friendly with China ) provides a huge stew of sociopathic people interested in human killing concoctions. Wuhan and researchers in China KNEW the problems with mRNA in 2018 especially things like protein misfolding which can result in things like amyloid proteins , which result in amyloid plaque. ( Alzheimer’s). I always find it interesting that the 2 big players in global strife ( Russia & China ) didn’t use mRNA shots in their fight against COVID. Search out which countries used Sputnik V vax and there will be some more interesting players. NATO countries largely went with mRNA.
Sputnik V and Sinovac do NOT have any where near the lethal side effects that mRNA does. Did the 2 Commie Countries just get lucky or did they see ( and encourage) the West to get on the train destined to go over the cliff? The Wuhan investigation was quickly swept under the rug , the Davos based WHO and China influenced UN helping out with that. Eco Health, Strozak, and Fauci all have big memory problems , especially when it comes to testifying. The “ billionaire “ was on BBC recently and stated that non natural pandemics WILL occur in the future ( with his trademark smirk on display during his statement).
The Game is still very much still in play I would say.
It should be noted that in the case of the Sputnik Jabs, at a minimum - they're based upon the AstraZeneca jabs, which simply use a less harmful vector, for implanting the Spike protein mRNA in the nucleus of your cells. They use an Adenovirus base, instead of a lipid-nano-particle graphene hydrogel platform. But they're still mRNA gene therapy technology, designed to turn people's own cells into mini-protein factories, producing the cyto-toxic spikes.
Excellent point Worldview ..... thanks for passing that along. It would be interesting to see how the two compare in Adverse Events and what type and then hopefully narrow down the substance or substances that are responsible for that.
Never forget the George Gao, the Fauci of China, sitting right next to Avril Haines at Event 201, talking about how to suppress suspicions that viruses are engineered in laboratories and don’t magically leap from animals to humans. He even refers the “rumors” about Ebola being released via vaccine trials from the U.S. lab in Sierra Leone, which China covered for at the time, backing up the U.S. Ebola effort, which happen to involve Metabiota, too.
I don’t think Nathan Wolfe invented the idea that you can predict pandemics by hunting for viruses and manipulating them in the lab. When I researched bird flu, I found that they were using this ruse at the WHO lab in Hong Kong prior to the first human cases of bird flu appearing there in the midst of the Hong Kong handover: https://organicconsumers.org/yoshihiro-kawaoka-weaponizing-bird-flu-since-1990-funded-by-fauci-gates/
There is also the small issue called China ..... and the Wuhan Institute. Whilst obviously being a place to have a SARS COV lab close by to all the areas of where the original SARS came about one would be totally stupid not to think that CCP interest would be circulating. Since Fauci was known to have visited the CIA in person ( entry not recorded at super secure CIA offices ) one could logically think that perhaps biodefence interests would be percolating too. BARDA was definitely involved. The “ billionaire “ thru his pet org called GAVI ( also friendly with China ) provides a huge stew of sociopathic people interested in human killing concoctions. Wuhan and researchers in China KNEW the problems with mRNA in 2018 especially things like protein misfolding which can result in things like amyloid proteins , which result in amyloid plaque. ( Alzheimer’s). I always find it interesting that the 2 big players in global strife ( Russia & China ) didn’t use mRNA shots in their fight against COVID. Search out which countries used Sputnik V vax and there will be some more interesting players. NATO countries largely went with mRNA.
Sputnik V and Sinovac do NOT have any where near the lethal side effects that mRNA does. Did the 2 Commie Countries just get lucky or did they see ( and encourage) the West to get on the train destined to go over the cliff? The Wuhan investigation was quickly swept under the rug , the Davos based WHO and China influenced UN helping out with that. Eco Health, Strozak, and Fauci all have big memory problems , especially when it comes to testifying. The “ billionaire “ was on BBC recently and stated that non natural pandemics WILL occur in the future ( with his trademark smirk on display during his statement).
The Game is still very much still in play I would say.
It should be noted that in the case of the Sputnik Jabs, at a minimum - they're based upon the AstraZeneca jabs, which simply use a less harmful vector, for implanting the Spike protein mRNA in the nucleus of your cells. They use an Adenovirus base, instead of a lipid-nano-particle graphene hydrogel platform. But they're still mRNA gene therapy technology, designed to turn people's own cells into mini-protein factories, producing the cyto-toxic spikes.
Excellent point Worldview ..... thanks for passing that along. It would be interesting to see how the two compare in Adverse Events and what type and then hopefully narrow down the substance or substances that are responsible for that.
Never forget the George Gao, the Fauci of China, sitting right next to Avril Haines at Event 201, talking about how to suppress suspicions that viruses are engineered in laboratories and don’t magically leap from animals to humans. He even refers the “rumors” about Ebola being released via vaccine trials from the U.S. lab in Sierra Leone, which China covered for at the time, backing up the U.S. Ebola effort, which happen to involve Metabiota, too.
I don’t think Nathan Wolfe invented the idea that you can predict pandemics by hunting for viruses and manipulating them in the lab. When I researched bird flu, I found that they were using this ruse at the WHO lab in Hong Kong prior to the first human cases of bird flu appearing there in the midst of the Hong Kong handover: https://organicconsumers.org/yoshihiro-kawaoka-weaponizing-bird-flu-since-1990-funded-by-fauci-gates/
Also, Metabiota appears to have been launched by Google.org in 2008: https://organicconsumers.org/googles-eric-schmidt-funding-wuhan-lab-covid-origins-cover/
I believe the evil billionaires you speak of might be the guys at Google & SpaceEx getting together for an Edge event where they were briefed by George Church (Nathan Wolfe was there too): https://organicconsumers.org/21st-century-dr-frankensteins-george-church/
Thanks for digging into Nathan Wolfe & Metabiota! Part of Metabiota was absorbed by Ginkgo Bioworks: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ginkgo-bioworks-announces-strategic-purchase-of-epidemiological-data-infrastructure-assets-301609075.html
That’s probably why Ginkgo’s SEC risk disclosure reads like the screenplay for a pandemic disaster flick: https://organicconsumers.org/bayers-modified-soil-microbes-could-trigger-a-ge-doomsday/