There have been quite a few abusive commenters commenting on this article. I am introducing some rules for commenting:
1) If you have a specific point that you want to refute with evidence, please add a link to the study you are talking about. Peer reviewed studies are okay, blogs that quote or analyse real world data are okay. Newspaper articles or government policy pages are not okay, unless they contain proper links to studies or data.
2) No abuse, no ad hominem comments, no name calling. From now on any commenters who call me names, or who call Dr Malone names, or anyone, will be banned immediately with no warning.
3) I will pray for anyone who calls me names. So I guess if you want to be prayed for and blessed, call me names, and I will ban you from commenting, and also pray for you at the same time.
4) On the other hand you could just post a nice comment asking me to pray for you or bless you.
5) Isn't it about time people left Dr Malone alone? If you like his substack, read it, if you don't, just ignore it. But this whole name calling thing, denying his credentials which are genuine, making up lies about him (whether on the left or the right) really has to stop.
6) If anyone posts an argument against any of the points I have already established in the article, and if give no evidence, I may well simply delete their comment anyway. I don't have time to keep arguing these points.
7) Give it a rest, people! The coronavirus is over, according to the US President...(!)
8) I thank God for Doctors like Robert Malone, for having the courage to stand up for the truth. Thank you Doctor Malone.
If Dr. Malone is a fraud---why does he have 9 Patents for developing the mRNA vaccine technology? This "fact check" website is the true fraud. Do your own deep research...
Here is my problem with Dr. Malone. I fully accept and never questioned his deep immersion in mRNA techology from the start. It is also clear he has a keen interest in and followed subsequent developments and studies on the subject. It isn't that he is not a scientist or well-informed on the subject: it is precisely because he is that causes my skepticism.
He says he took the mRNA shot, yet I recall he co-authored a study published in 2020 about the dangers of the shot while the shot became available in late 2020. Such studies are done before the publication date.
Even without that study, many earlier studies showed mRNA causes issues when used as a "vaccine" in animals. I find the explanation of needing to travel, which I recall he said, is not overcome by the potential mRNA risks when there are technologies that permit video conferencing.
So, if there is something I have missed, please inform me because I don't trust the man. I think he is a trojan horse in the health freedom area and see his attacks on some in that area as unwarranted. But if I am wrong, please clear that up.
Based on your replies to me, I'm going to respectfully observe that you have no training in science., Criticizing a source is never ad hominem nor defamation. Scientists are stringently trained to immediately take apart the source, no need to be polite about it. Dr. Malone would also be trained that way. That's how real science works.
Second, in science, it is no one's job to present counter arguments. It is 100% the scientists' job to establish their own credibility and present information that withstand the most nitpicking scrutiny on the planet. That's how real science works. This is how every scientific study is treated by default. If you feel yourself getting upset about it, you were never trained as a scientist.
Dr. Malone was once respected. Over the last few years he has turned it around. He played a minor role 30 years ago in developing mRNA vaccines, and apparently he felt like he deserved more credit. He has a personal beef with the science establishment. So he has been doing a tour of extreme right anti-science media, where the enjoys being credited as the inventor of mRNA vaccines, tells anti science lies, and gets huge applause after her tells people with no science education exactly what they want to hear. He has disgraced himself with his colleagues, and this is now the only job he can get.
He uis a FALKSE expert. He is going around basking in the praise of people who have noin idea what he's talking about. And he is telling deadly lies about COVID.
As a trained scientist, he knows darn well,, he's lying. He made a decision to cash in and soak up the adulation he never earned. He is the most famous COVID fraud in the world.
Also as a scientist, he can handle criticism and does not need anyone to defend him. Legitimate work survives the harshest criticism, and that is the test for legitimacy.
Dr. Malone made a choice to tell deadly lies for cash and attention. This is immoral. You need to stop once and for all getting life and death medical advice from frauds. He isn't being "suppressed." He is being ignored for the same reason any "science" is ignored. He did terrible work.
No scientist needs prayer for any reason. Pray for those who are harmed by his deadly lies.
There have been quite a few abusive commenters commenting on this article. I am introducing some rules for commenting:
1) If you have a specific point that you want to refute with evidence, please add a link to the study you are talking about. Peer reviewed studies are okay, blogs that quote or analyse real world data are okay. Newspaper articles or government policy pages are not okay, unless they contain proper links to studies or data.
2) No abuse, no ad hominem comments, no name calling. From now on any commenters who call me names, or who call Dr Malone names, or anyone, will be banned immediately with no warning.
3) I will pray for anyone who calls me names. So I guess if you want to be prayed for and blessed, call me names, and I will ban you from commenting, and also pray for you at the same time.
4) On the other hand you could just post a nice comment asking me to pray for you or bless you.
5) Isn't it about time people left Dr Malone alone? If you like his substack, read it, if you don't, just ignore it. But this whole name calling thing, denying his credentials which are genuine, making up lies about him (whether on the left or the right) really has to stop.
6) If anyone posts an argument against any of the points I have already established in the article, and if give no evidence, I may well simply delete their comment anyway. I don't have time to keep arguing these points.
7) Give it a rest, people! The coronavirus is over, according to the US President...(!)
8) I thank God for Doctors like Robert Malone, for having the courage to stand up for the truth. Thank you Doctor Malone.
If Dr. Malone is a fraud---why does he have 9 Patents for developing the mRNA vaccine technology? This "fact check" website is the true fraud. Do your own deep research...
Here is my problem with Dr. Malone. I fully accept and never questioned his deep immersion in mRNA techology from the start. It is also clear he has a keen interest in and followed subsequent developments and studies on the subject. It isn't that he is not a scientist or well-informed on the subject: it is precisely because he is that causes my skepticism.
He says he took the mRNA shot, yet I recall he co-authored a study published in 2020 about the dangers of the shot while the shot became available in late 2020. Such studies are done before the publication date.
Even without that study, many earlier studies showed mRNA causes issues when used as a "vaccine" in animals. I find the explanation of needing to travel, which I recall he said, is not overcome by the potential mRNA risks when there are technologies that permit video conferencing.
So, if there is something I have missed, please inform me because I don't trust the man. I think he is a trojan horse in the health freedom area and see his attacks on some in that area as unwarranted. But if I am wrong, please clear that up.
Thanks!
Based on your replies to me, I'm going to respectfully observe that you have no training in science., Criticizing a source is never ad hominem nor defamation. Scientists are stringently trained to immediately take apart the source, no need to be polite about it. Dr. Malone would also be trained that way. That's how real science works.
Second, in science, it is no one's job to present counter arguments. It is 100% the scientists' job to establish their own credibility and present information that withstand the most nitpicking scrutiny on the planet. That's how real science works. This is how every scientific study is treated by default. If you feel yourself getting upset about it, you were never trained as a scientist.
Dr. Malone was once respected. Over the last few years he has turned it around. He played a minor role 30 years ago in developing mRNA vaccines, and apparently he felt like he deserved more credit. He has a personal beef with the science establishment. So he has been doing a tour of extreme right anti-science media, where the enjoys being credited as the inventor of mRNA vaccines, tells anti science lies, and gets huge applause after her tells people with no science education exactly what they want to hear. He has disgraced himself with his colleagues, and this is now the only job he can get.
He uis a FALKSE expert. He is going around basking in the praise of people who have noin idea what he's talking about. And he is telling deadly lies about COVID.
As a trained scientist, he knows darn well,, he's lying. He made a decision to cash in and soak up the adulation he never earned. He is the most famous COVID fraud in the world.
Also as a scientist, he can handle criticism and does not need anyone to defend him. Legitimate work survives the harshest criticism, and that is the test for legitimacy.
Dr. Malone made a choice to tell deadly lies for cash and attention. This is immoral. You need to stop once and for all getting life and death medical advice from frauds. He isn't being "suppressed." He is being ignored for the same reason any "science" is ignored. He did terrible work.
No scientist needs prayer for any reason. Pray for those who are harmed by his deadly lies.
He is a straight up fraud who has a personal beef with the science community. He is now disgraced.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8001631/ read this if you have the brain capacity, something I highly doubt